Cool to see SSF being leveraged for "consent events" I can see how consent might run into less friction when following the same path as threat intelligence, making it transparent to the end user. I maintain that consent is NOT dead. It's alive...if you want it to be.
Thanks, Steve! I’ve just been learning about your deep experience with SSF. That’s very cool to know. As for “proof of consent aliveness”…well, I remain suspicious that consent is even the right legal structure for us to be using. 😀 But it’s what we e got now, so optimizing it definitely still makes sense.
It’s definitely good! I’m still holding out for a parallel strategy: opportunistic improvements plus looking into disruptive innovation (which in this case might involve technologies, legal/regulatory options, radical transparency…).
Cool to see SSF being leveraged for "consent events" I can see how consent might run into less friction when following the same path as threat intelligence, making it transparent to the end user. I maintain that consent is NOT dead. It's alive...if you want it to be.
Thanks, Steve! I’ve just been learning about your deep experience with SSF. That’s very cool to know. As for “proof of consent aliveness”…well, I remain suspicious that consent is even the right legal structure for us to be using. 😀 But it’s what we e got now, so optimizing it definitely still makes sense.
You know how the saying goes… Smoke ‘em if you got ‘em. What’s better than being opportunistic about privacy management?
It’s definitely good! I’m still holding out for a parallel strategy: opportunistic improvements plus looking into disruptive innovation (which in this case might involve technologies, legal/regulatory options, radical transparency…).